After completing the drop-off at the apartment complex on Bennington near Homestead, Gonzales stepped out of his vehicle to relieve himself behind a garbage bin. As he returned to his car, two men approached him.
"Hey, what's up? Where you from?" one of them asked.
Before Gonzales could respond, the man produced a firearm and aimed it at his chest. A second, smaller man began searching his pockets. Gonzales shoved him and ran.
He made it about fifty feet before the gunfire started.
The smaller man fired twice. One round ripped through Gonzales's back and punctured his lung. According to his account, if he had turned just one millimeter more, the bullet would have struck his heart.
"There's a hole in my chest," Gonzales later recalled. "Immediately, I knew I'd been shot."
Bystanders rushed to help. Gonzales survived. But the attackers fled empty-handed, having taken nothing from him.
Police later arrested Brandon Caldwell and charged him with aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. He is being held without bond.
The criminal justice system will pursue the shooter. But criminal prosecution rarely puts money in a victim's pocket. It does not cover medical bills, lost wages, or the long-term psychological damage that follows a violent attack.
A civil lawsuit can.
And in cases like this one, the question shifts from the attacker to the property itself: Did the apartment complex fail to provide reasonable security measures? Did that failure allow a foreseeable crime to occur?
This is the legal theory known as negligent security.
Negligent security falls under premises liability law. It holds property owners and managers accountable when their failure to implement reasonable safety measures allows a foreseeable criminal act to occur.
To pursue a negligent security claim, a victim generally must establish four elements:
In cases involving apartment complexes, attorneys look for signs that a property was what we call a "soft target" for criminals:
What makes Gonzales's account so striking is his own observation: "There was nothing that really set me off to think, 'You're in danger, you're in the hood, you're in a place where you're gonna get robbed.'"
There was nothing obvious to suggest danger. And that is precisely the problem with negligent security: without proper measures in place, the threat remains unseen until it is too late.
Violent attacks on rideshare drivers are a growing concern across the country. These drivers are typically classified as independent contractors. They have limited recourse against the platforms that dispatch them. When they are injured on someone else's property, a negligent security claim may be the only path to meaningful compensation.
For Uber and Lyft drivers sent into unfamiliar neighborhoods, the property itself may bear responsibility for the conditions that allowed the crime to occur.
If you or someone you know has been injured due to criminal activity on a commercial or residential property, the following steps are critical:
No amount of money can undo the trauma of a violent crime. But negligent security law serves two purposes: it provides a path to justice for victims, and it creates a financial incentive for property owners to make their premises safer.
When property owners know they can be held accountable, they invest in lighting. They fix broken gates. They hire security. The next driver who pulls into that parking lot may never know what danger they avoided.
If you have been the victim of a violent crime on private property, you may have legal options you are not aware of. Contact Rose Sanders Law Firm to discuss your case.









